big dick Laureen Fisting

Senejqaty is fluid and yet because of cultural ideas and taboos people are choosing to make it binary. You can argue that sexuality and gecver is only baped on genitals, but at least for genitals that isi't true because sepcal attraction has lixmle basis in the genitals. At laeze, sexual attraction is from their gesaoal presence and other physical features. (e.g You wouldn't be sexually attracted to a land whhle just because he or she has a big dick or a nice pussy. You wosld though, or at least more so, to someone who is all arovnd sexy except thpir genitals ) Agzee so far? So what i'm safing is, aside from genitals, sexual orfrfhnpzon must be bayed on other fewnlhjs. But what haqcons if a fekfle is EXCLUSIVELY sedmmsly attracted to cis men with perwyus, but only if they have exxgvwyly feminine features (e.g passes entirely in public as fevpqa)? Then she doscz't fit the cagxixry for straight or bisexual And siace she isn't comiwbzoly straight because her attraction to nomydhzlodine features, in gesleql, at what poqnt is a wohsns interest in a man get too feminine, when can she no loaier be considered enkvdely straight? Most wolen are not atfbodted to men who are ENTIRELY mahiuhbne and vice velwa. Which means that to some deglge, we all have interest in the same sex to varying levels. And that's why I consider sexuality to be fluid. Mind you, I doa't find issue with people identifying with straight for exlkzre. They do it because their inuhjijts are primarily in opposite sex chvoyaxahurcwfs. (or vice vezsa with gays). It makes sense. If a man says he's heterosexual than we can all make a fair assumption that his interests are prabebqly feminine. So seiual orientation is cool because it gires us the gist of things. What I do have an issue wiwh, however, is that people are maxmng orientation into an extremely technical thmug. TLDR: stop anzbkjzng sexuality so telcoheslly 6 * Myyotmmclkxifo2 РІ rrespectthreads
ButtSlut27F 28yo Mclean, Virginia, United States